What went well with this section is that by the time I was finished it did have quite a clear argument and it answered my title directly very well. However there were issues with it to, initially I was trying to fit to much stuff which wasn't entirely relevant into it such as his identification with Achilles which although is an aspect of his character did not fit in well with the rest of the section and therefore the dissertation. I therefore, similarly to what happened with the military section, had to re-evaluate what I was going to do when I planned it. I decided to make exclude the irrelevancies simply for ease of argument and this did make it a lot easier to plan and write so that when read it flows and is coherent in argument. However I noticed that there was a lot of overlap with other sections, I have often delved into character analysis throughout my dissertation and assessed whether or not this makes him worthy of his epithet - for instance in the generalship section which is essentially simply one aspect of his character. As a result I am not sure about what this entire section brings to the dissertation and when I edit my dissertation I may try and condense this a lot and rather than having it almost separate to the other bits link it together so it ties the dissertation coherently into one thing before the conclusion which I think will really help the fluidity of it.
Although this section does flag up some potential problems the issues I had with it only go to show how well my planning and writing methods work because the issue over some irrelevant issues I discovered was solved before I actually had to write the paragraphs completely - I wrote the topic sentences then read them all and found it didn't quite work as an overall argument. This shows how time saving good planning is and makes me very happy in the methods that I am using when writing and planning my dissertation. This has taught me to always plan in detail before writing so you solve problems early which means you don't get flustered when you're writing which effects the quality of what is being written.
Overall I am happy with what I have written in this section but less so in how it fits in with the rest of the dissertation as, whilst extremely relevant, it seems a bit repetitive and sort of latched on at the end with little flow between sections.
Although this section does flag up some potential problems the issues I had with it only go to show how well my planning and writing methods work because the issue over some irrelevant issues I discovered was solved before I actually had to write the paragraphs completely - I wrote the topic sentences then read them all and found it didn't quite work as an overall argument. This shows how time saving good planning is and makes me very happy in the methods that I am using when writing and planning my dissertation. This has taught me to always plan in detail before writing so you solve problems early which means you don't get flustered when you're writing which effects the quality of what is being written.
Overall I am happy with what I have written in this section but less so in how it fits in with the rest of the dissertation as, whilst extremely relevant, it seems a bit repetitive and sort of latched on at the end with little flow between sections.